Friday, January 22, 2010

And now, for something completely different...






I applaud this return to common sense, not to mention a certain professional decorum. Never having been to the Pentagon, let alone worked there, I can only say that seeing Officers and EM around town in other areas of the country, looking as though they belonged on a work detail policing the grounds rather than conducting official business, has never seemed appropriate.

Once the hole in Manhattan quit smoking--and it did take quite a while--it was enough already with the self-aggrandizing Rambo posturing (remember the troops in the airports with no ammunition in their M-16s, post-9/11?) and time to get back to running a Defense establishment. We know well that the Military are all that stand between us and the Commie/Islamist hordes, and it is to our guys and gals in uniform that we owe the opportunity to continue this Grand Experiment we call the USA. Nonetheless, the folks (and it's not that many of us anymore) who are paying the bills don't go to work in the same clothes in which we do yard chores and neither should the folks who are spending all those billions. If you are carrying a brief-case, instead of a rake or an M-16, then dress like you've got the key to the executive washroom, instead of like the guy who burns the contents of those barrels behind the latrine.

Another thing: lose the cartoonish colored ribbons, except perhaps on Dress/Ceremonial uniforms. This is the 21st Century--there are neither knights, barons, dukes nor other nobles who command a practiced obeisance as they make their way through the halls and across the parking lot. Only the guy at the next desk knows what the ribbons stand for, and I'd bet the civilian staff neither know nor care. The fruit salad says nothing about your ability to withstand the blandishments of defense contractors.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

The Supreme Court Perverts the First Amendment

The campaign-finance decision puts democracy up for the highest bid.
"It’s a dangerous thing to be naive about money and politics, and this opinion, naive to its bones, is a very dangerous opinion. It sets up a structure that almost ensures the end of meaningful representation at a federal level, around any issue in which major corporate interests have a stake."
[from the Slate, Big Money Column]




Sunday, January 3, 2010

Money, the Humane Society of the United States and lastly--the Animals

Just in case you've been wondering where Humane Society of the United States funds really go:

It's not much of a secret where the funds do _not_ go. For 2008:
 "HSUS gave only a little more than
  $450,000—that’s just half of one
  percent of its total budget—in
  grants to organizations providing
  hands-on care to dogs and cats."

 "HSUS is a multinational conglomerate
  with ten regional offices in the United
  States and a special Hollywood Office
  that promotes and monitors the media’s
  coverage of animal-rights issues.
  It includes a huge web of organizations,
  affiliates, and subsidiaries. Some are
  nonprofit, tax-exempt “charities,” while
  others are for-profit taxable corporations,
  which don’t have to divulge anything about
  their financial dealings."

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Have newspapers buried themselves...?

 "Newspapers need to launch a national campaign to remind people
  how vital they are — while there are still papers left to run the story.
  In the futurist nightmare “Fahrenheit 451,” firemen are enlisted to
  burn all books and periodicals. In our real future, we won’t need to
  call fire fighters to banish newspapers. The newspapers seem to
  be doing it for us."

Article here: Have newspapers buried themselves in banality?

Friday, November 27, 2009

"Yes, Sarah, there IS a Media conspiracy"

The GOP would like to ignore Palin, but they can't. Oddly enough, the Democrats seem to understand a little better how much of a threat she is.

 "So Sarah Palin is now in that category of politician
  whom reporters feel safe in attacking.

 "Some of this is definitely her own fault.... Hillary's
  campaign had the same problem, particularly after
  Iowa, [Hillary's] press handlers...openly treated
  the trail reporters like a swarm of venomous insects....
  Once the politician-reporter relationship reaches that
  level, that candidacy is going to be in serious trouble.

 "Obama’s press people, meanwhile, behaved like a
  team of well-trained Starbuck’s baristas: quiet,
  accommodating, nonconfrontational. Then again, the
  reporters mostly all worshipped [Obama], so they
  didn’t have any reason to behave otherwise. That part
  of the media-conspiracy narrative is definitely true.

 "I remember one particular trip when Obama came
  back to our part of the plane wearing jeans and a
  white button-down shirt and there was audible chirping
  from several female reporters. ...getting photographed
  with Obama was like a rite of passage.... Needless
  to say nothing like that went on in the Hillary press
  corps, or more especially in the McCain plane....

  -- Matt Taibbi

Read it all, here.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Teachings of Islam

"Does Islam in reality teach the opposite of what we witness in the real world, and is it truly a religion of peace? Or, are we being duped by apologists of the faith?"
   http://sites.google.com/site/islamicscripturesunveiled/

Monday, August 17, 2009

The Checker Shadow Illusion

Squares "A" and "B" are the same shade of gray. Proof

Burt Rutan's 2009 Oshkosh Climate Change Presentation

"One aggressively selling a technical product, the merits of which depend on complex experimental data, is likely lying."
RUTAN 2009-08-05.ppt

Friday, August 7, 2009

Islam v Non-Islam

Relations with the Islamic world have a dangerous potential, possibly equalling that of any previous period in America's history. Below, a little food for thought...


"MUSLIM DEMOGRAPHICS":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU


"THE END OF EUROPE":

1/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlkEYoKC-kA

2/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBc5V4Ph9n4

3/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKlXgRS9TZo

4/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJfXRPBpdiM

5/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYXqpBGimPA


"MARK STEYN on MULTICULTURISM":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdEGJb5W5ks



Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Nugent on "Social Responsibility"

Sometimes the best way to introduce a highly charged subject is to present a most highly charged advocate.

One of the most sincere, energetic, and involved spokesmen for the Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms is Ted Nugent. The 60-year old "Motor City Madman" is not shy about his beliefs, and if you haven't been introduced to his style and his substance, you've missed a good show. Nugent was interviewed in 2007 by Evan Smith, during "Texas Monthly Talks", on KLRU Public TV in Austin,Texas.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

1984: Then and Now







If you bought a book legally, and someone took it from your shelf without your permission, how would you feel? Victimized, perhaps? What if a government allowed that taking, or even required it? Wouldn't that be...Orwellian? Shades of 1984, in other words, in which government censors erased all traces of news reports embarrassing to the government.

Well, don't look now folks, but Amazon.com recently did some erasing of their own. They remotely deleted books from their customers' Kindles, without asking or even announcing their intentions. But wait, it gets better. What makes this case especially juicy are the titles which Amazon deleted: the aforementioned 1984, and Orwell's classic tale of the perversion of democracy, Animal Farm. Irony thick enough to cut with a knife, right?

Amazon claims they will not do such a thing again, but why should anyone have the power to do so in the first place?

If you'd like to read either of the books in question online (or download a copy to keep), you can do so. You can, for example, Google "1984 download" and find more than one source. Isn't the Internet wonderful?

Other links: Volokh, 1984, Animal Farm